EPFO Notification
of August 2014
In August 2014,
the EPFO issued a notification introducing the following changes:
- Statutory
wage ceiling increased from INR 6500 pm to INR 15000 pm
- New
members earning over INR 15000 pm will not be eligible to become EPS members, existing
EPS members to continue pension contributions.
- Existing
pension members contributing on higher pay to submit a joint employer -employee
application to continue, else earlier contributions to be earmarked back to PF.
- Higher
contributions to pension to attract an additional payout of 1.16% of PF wages by
the employee, to be allocated from employee’s contribution
Calculation of pensionable salary effective
September 2014
- The
pensionable salary has been defined as the average of the last 60 months’ salary
Higher Pension
under the EPS, 1995
(Supreme
Court Order on Nov. 04, 2022)
Judgement
of Hon’ble Supreme Court (November 4, 2022)
• The Supreme Court in its ruling
dated November 4, 2022, held that the amendment made in the EPS Scheme by EPFO
vide Gazette Notification No. GSR. 609(E) dated 22.8.2014 are legal and valid subject
to certain directions.
• The employees who had exercised option
previously and continued to be in service as on 1st September 2014, will be guided
by the amended provisions of the pension scheme.
• - The members of the scheme, who did
not exercise the option earlier of the pension scheme (as it was before the 2014
Amendment) would be entitled to exercise option under paragraph 11(4) of the
post amendment scheme. The Supreme Court granted additional time to members to exercise
such option under paragraph 11(4) of the scheme for a period of four months from
the date of the ruling.
The
employees who had retired prior to 1st September 2014 without exercising any
option and have already exited from the membership thereof. They would not be entitled
to the benefit of this judgment.
|
HIGHER
PENSION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
|
|
Date of Retirement
|
Contribution
on Higher Wages by Employer and Employee
|
Option Exercised
or Not
|
Acceptance
by EPFO
|
Eligibility
for
pension
on Higher Wages
|
|
Before 1 Sep 14
|
Not Paid
|
Never Opted
|
-
|
Not
Eligible
|
|
Before 1 Sep 14
|
Paid
|
Never Opted
|
-
|
Not
Eligible
|
|
Before 1 Sep 14
|
Paid
|
Exercised
option before 1 Sep 14
|
Rejected
/ not responded
|
Eligible
|
|
Retired between 1 Sep 14 to 4 Nov 22
|
Paid
|
Never Opted
|
Option can
be given by 4 Mar 23
|
Eligible
|
|
Retired between 1 Sep 14 to 4Nov 22
|
Paid
|
Exercised
option between 1 Sep 14
to 4 Nov
22
|
Rejected
/ not responded
|
Eligible
|
|
Retired between 1 Sep 14 to 4Nov 22
|
Not paid
|
Never Opted
|
-
|
Not
Eligible
|
|
Joined before 1 Sep 14 and
continue in service
|
Paid
|
Never Opted
|
Option can
be given by 4 Mar 23
|
Eligible
|
|
Joined before 1 Sep 14 and
continue in service
|
Paid
|
Exercised
option between 1 Sep 14
to 4 Nov
22
|
Rejected
/ not responded
|
Eligible
|
|
Joined before 1 Sep 14 and
continue in service
|
Not Paid
|
Never Opted
|
-
|
Not
Eligible
|
|
Joined on or after 1 Sep 14
|
Not Eligible
for EPS
|
No Option
|
-
|
Not
Eligible
|
• The requirement under proviso to paragraph 11(4) for additional employee’s
contribution to the extent of 1.16% for members who have opted for higher
pension was held to be illegal. The SC held that since the EPF Act did not
contemplate any contribution to be made by an employee to remain in the EPS,
the Central Government under the scheme itself cannot mandate such a
stipulation. Thus, the provision of the scheme requiring additional contribution
was held to be ultra-vires of the EPF Act. However, the SC held that such
additional contribution from employee’s share of contribution will continue
until 6 months from the date of ruling or till such time any amendment is made to
the Pension Scheme by the Government, whichever is earlier.
• The Supreme Court held that the
employees of an exempted establishment which maintain Private Provident Fund
Trust should not be deprived of the benefit of getting the option to remain in
the pension scheme while drawing salary beyond the statutory ceiling. Thus, it
was held that the Pension Scheme should apply to the employees of exempted
establishments in the same manner as it applies to unexempted or regular establishments.
EPFO Circular
(February 20, 2023)
- The
EPFO vide circular dated 20 February 2023 clarifies that the employees who satisfy
the following conditions may opt for the higher pension.
- Employees
and employers who had contributed under the Provident Fund Scheme on salary exceeding
the statutory ceiling (INR 15000); and
- Who
did not exercise higher pension option earlier; and
- Who
were members of the Pension Scheme prior to 1 September 2014 and continued to be
members on or after 1 September 2014.
- For
the EPS Members, who would like to opt for the aforesaid benefit, the EPFO will
release modality at EPFO Portal, so that the concerned members may apply online
for the same. The last date of filing application is 3rd March 2023.
- EPFO
will issue further guidelines on the method of (a) reallocation of past corpus from
the Provident Fund to the Pension Scheme; and (b) computation of pension for such
employees
Higher Pension
under the EPS, 1995
Basis the
ruling of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 4th November 2022 and EPFO circular dated
20th February 2023, employees opt for higher pension. The applicability of the Supreme
Court ruling and EPFO circular can be analysed in the following situations
Higher Pension
under the EPS, 1995 (PROS & CONS)
|
PROS
|
CONS
|
|
Tension-free fixed income at the vulnerable old age
of a member
|
Scheme viability as there are huge outflows
|
|
Better for people with no Financial Discipline
|
Considerable amount to be shifted from Provident
Fund & contribution till attaining age of 58
|
|
Members who are retired or about to retire will
start receiving higher pension immediately
|
No return of Corpus amount
|
|
|
No Interest is earned on Corpus
|
|
|
No Inflation Adjustment
|
• The decision to opt for a higher
pension depends on the individual’s specific situation and factors like the
ability to invest the corpus in alternate funds, cash flow requirements, life expectancy,
etc.
• It may be noted that member may face
procedural challenges due to delay in the implementation. The field offices are
finding it difficult to answer queries from members and pensioners. The EPFO
top brass feels that higher pension may deplete the resource base in no time. EPFO
is facing difficulties in implementing the Court’s directions.